linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Stop clearing unit attentions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7384200-ea7d-a418-3793-98083c6b425f@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:24:47 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Stop clearing unit attentions

On 01/10/2021 19:59, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/30/21 11:52 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Finally, there is another thing to change.  The reason
>> ufshcd_suspend_prepare() does a runtime resume of sdev_rpmb is because the
>> UAC clear would wait for an async runtime resume, which will never happen
>> during system suspend because the PM workqueue gets frozen.  So with the
>> removal of UAC clear, ufshcd_suspend_prepare() and ufshcd_resume_complete()
>> should be updated also, to leave rpmb alone.
> 
> Is the following change what you have in mind?

Yes, exactly.

> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 0a28cc4c09d8..0743f54e55f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -9648,10 +9648,6 @@ void ufshcd_resume_complete(struct device *dev)
>          ufshcd_rpm_put(hba);
>          hba->complete_put = false;
>      }
> -    if (hba->rpmb_complete_put) {
> -        ufshcd_rpmb_rpm_put(hba);
> -        hba->rpmb_complete_put = false;
> -    }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_resume_complete);
> 
> @@ -9674,10 +9670,6 @@ int ufshcd_suspend_prepare(struct device *dev)
>          }
>          hba->complete_put = true;
>      }
> -    if (hba->sdev_rpmb) {
> -        ufshcd_rpmb_rpm_get_sync(hba);
> -        hba->rpmb_complete_put = true;
> -    }
>      return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_suspend_prepare);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 86b615023ecb..5ecfcd8cae0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ struct ufs_hba {
>  #endif
>      u32 luns_avail;
>      bool complete_put;
> -    bool rpmb_complete_put;
>  };
> 
>  /* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.