[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7386079f-0dfe-9f55-6297-1f9ee67cd9d6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 22:50:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/35] clk: tegra: Support runtime PM and power domain
01.10.2021 15:32, Ulf Hansson пишет:
>> +static int tegra_clock_sync_pd_state(struct tegra_clk_device *clk_dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long rate;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&clk_dev->lock);
>> +
>> + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(clk_dev->dev)) {
>> + rate = clk_hw_get_rate(clk_dev->hw);
>> + ret = tegra_clock_set_pd_state(clk_dev, rate);
> Don't we need to sync the performance state even when the device is
> runtime suspended?
>
> Perhaps the clock, via a child-clock for example, can get
> prepared/enabled (hence its device gets runtime resumed) before there
> is a clock rate update for it. Then there is no performance state set
> for it, right? Or maybe that isn't a problem?
>
Good catch! Older versions of this patch had a special handling for clk
enable/disable. I just forgot to update this function, it's now not a
problem to change performance state of a suspended device and it
actually needs to be done. I'll correct it, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists