linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add check for continue statement in UNNECESSARY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91569a87ac55da392fa894e8ad55292b98c558f3.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:22:13 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add check for continue statement in
 UNNECESSARY_ELSE

On Sat, 2021-10-02 at 00:56 +0530, Utkarsh Verma wrote:
> UNNECESSARY_ELSE only checks for the usage of else after a return or
> break. But the same logic is also true for continue statement.
> 
> else used after a continue statement is unnecessary. So add a test
> for continue statement also.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index c27d2312cfc3..f5a911aa6b64 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -4011,15 +4011,16 @@ sub process {
>  
> 
>  # check indentation of any line with a bare else
>  # (but not if it is a multiple line "if (foo) return bar; else return baz;")
> -# if the previous line is a break or return and is indented 1 tab more...
> +# if the previous line is a break or continue or return and is indented 1 tab more...
>  		if ($sline =~ /^\+([\t]+)(?:}[ \t]*)?else(?:[ \t]*{)?\s*$/) {
>  			my $tabs = length($1) + 1;
>  			if ($prevline =~ /^\+\t{$tabs,$tabs}break\b/ ||
> +			    $prevline =~ /^\+\t{$tabs,$tabs}continue\b/ ||

I suppose this is ok.  I'd generally write this on one line.

			if ($prevline =~ /^\+\t{$tabs,$tabs}(?:break|continue)\b/ ||