[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d41c34c1-cb22-25a0-2bd1-49f1ea177c21@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 01:36:02 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: zhaoxiao <zhaoxiao@...ontech.com>, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: jordan@...micpenguin.net, saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org,
jonathan@...ek.ca, airlied@...hat.com, smasetty@...eaurora.org,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, akhilpo@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: msm: adreno_gpu.c: Add and use pr_fmt(fmt)
On 26/08/2021 05:23, zhaoxiao wrote:
> Use a more common logging style.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhaoxiao <zhaoxiao@...ontech.com>
Your subject tells about pr_fmt(), while the patch itself changs
printk()s to pr_info(). Could you please fix the commit subject and
expand/correct commit message?
> ---
> v2:Remove the line: #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c:23:9: warning: 'pr_fmt' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> ^
> include/linux/printk.h:348:9: note: previous definition is here
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> index 9f5a30234b33..f10e9e04c13b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ void adreno_dump_info(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> int i;
>
> - printk("revision: %d (%d.%d.%d.%d)\n",
> + pr_info("revision: %d (%d.%d.%d.%d)\n",
> adreno_gpu->info->revn, adreno_gpu->rev.core,
> adreno_gpu->rev.major, adreno_gpu->rev.minor,
> adreno_gpu->rev.patchid);
> @@ -761,12 +761,12 @@ void adreno_dump_info(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++) {
> struct msm_ringbuffer *ring = gpu->rb[i];
>
> - printk("rb %d: fence: %d/%d\n", i,
> + pr_info("rb %d: fence: %d/%d\n", i,
> ring->memptrs->fence,
> ring->seqno);
>
> - printk("rptr: %d\n", get_rptr(adreno_gpu, ring));
> - printk("rb wptr: %d\n", get_wptr(ring));
> + pr_info("rptr: %d\n", get_rptr(adreno_gpu, ring));
> + pr_info("rb wptr: %d\n", get_wptr(ring));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ void adreno_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> return;
>
> /* dump these out in a form that can be parsed by demsm: */
> - printk("IO:region %s 00000000 00020000\n", gpu->name);
> + pr_info("IO:region %s 00000000 00020000\n", gpu->name);
> for (i = 0; adreno_gpu->registers[i] != ~0; i += 2) {
> uint32_t start = adreno_gpu->registers[i];
> uint32_t end = adreno_gpu->registers[i+1];
> @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ void adreno_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>
> for (addr = start; addr <= end; addr++) {
> uint32_t val = gpu_read(gpu, addr);
> - printk("IO:R %08x %08x\n", addr<<2, val);
> + pr_info("IO:R %08x %08x\n", addr<<2, val);
> }
> }
> }
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists