linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-b5a035ae-a545-4c81-a8d9-301c6f7e6982@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Date:   Sat, 02 Oct 2021 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
To:     anup@...infault.org
CC:     pbonzini@...hat.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, graf@...zon.com,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v20 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 04:58:41 PDT (-0700), anup@...infault.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer, Hi Paolo,
>
> [...]
>
> The RISC-V H-extension is now frozen. Please refer to the latest
> RISC-V privilege specification v1.12 which is in public review.
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/riscv-privileged-20210915-public-review/riscv-privileged-20210915-public-review.pdf
>
> Currently, the RISC-V H-extension is on it's way to being ratified.
> https://wiki.riscv.org/display/TECH/ISA+Extensions+On+Deck+for+Freeze+Milestone
> https://wiki.riscv.org/display/TECH/ISA+Extensions+On+Deck+-+Ready+for+Ratification+Milestone
>
> Here's the announcement on twitter from Mark (CTO, RISC-V International)
> https://twitter.com/mark_riscv/status/1441375977624375296
>
> This means the KVM RISC-V series now satisfies the
> requirements of the Linux RISC-V patch acceptance policy.
>
> Can we consider the KVM RISC-V series for Linux-5.16 ?

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>

IIUC the plan here involved a shared tag at some point, with most of 
this going through Paolo's tree.  If you still want me to merge 
something then I'm happy to do so, just make it clear as I've mostly 
lost track of things.