| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 14:53:32 +0200
From: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@...il.com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>,
matt-testalltheway <sefoci9222@...unway.com>,
Kamil Dudka <kdudka@...hat.com>,
Robert Swiecki <robert@...ecki.net>,
Kamil Pietrzak <kpietrzak@...root.org>, Igor <igor@...lig.com>,
Tor Vic <torvic9@...lbox.org>, Poezevara <nephartyz@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update ASUS WMI supported boards.
Hello Oleksandr,
216 ⁰C is a blank value. According to
https://www.asus.com/Motherboards-Components/Motherboards/Workstation/Pro-WS-X570-ACE/techspec/
there is no T_Sensor header on this board.
Best regards,
Eugene
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 14:47, Oleksandr Natalenko
<oleksandr@...alenko.name> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On neděle 3. října 2021 13:50:12 CEST Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > On sobota 2. října 2021 23:08:53 CEST Denis Pauk wrote:
> > > Add support to nct6775:
> > > * PRIME B360-PLUS
> > > * PRIME X570-PRO
> > > * ROG CROSSHAIR VIII FORMULA
> > > * ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
> > > * ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING
> > > * ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
> > > * TUF GAMING B550-PRO
> > > * TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS
> > > * TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)
> >
> > Thank you for this submission.
> >
> > Do you happen to know whether it can be extended with another ASUS board
> > which is:
> >
> > ```
> > Manufacturer: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
> > Product Name: Pro WS X570-ACE
> > ```
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I've got one, and in case any info or testing is needed, I'd be happy to
> > contribute.
> >
> > Currently, this board is kinda working after adding
> > `acpi_enforce_resources=lax`, but I assume a proper support is needed
> > instead.
>
> Partially answering to myself, but still need some clarification.
>
> I did this on top of your recent submissions:
>
> ```
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus_wmi_sensors.c b/drivers/hwmon/
> asus_wmi_sensors.c
> index 6b04fad18891..f6817ec9de29 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/asus_wmi_sensors.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/asus_wmi_sensors.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #define ASUS_EC_KNOWN_EC_REGISTERS 14
>
> enum asus_wmi_ec_board {
> + BOARD_PW_X570_A, // Pro WS X570-ACE
> BOARD_R_C8H, // ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
> BOARD_R_C8DH, // ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
> BOARD_R_C8F, // ROG Crosshair VIII Formula
> @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ enum asus_wmi_ec_board {
>
> /* boards with EC support */
> static const char *const asus_wmi_ec_boards_names[] = {
> + [BOARD_PW_X570_A] = "Pro WS X570-ACE",
> [BOARD_R_C8H] = "ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO",
> [BOARD_R_C8DH] = "ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO",
> [BOARD_R_C8F] = "ROG CROSSHAIR VIII FORMULA",
> @@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ static void asus_wmi_ec_fill_board_sensors(struct
> asus_wmi_ec_info *ec, int boar
> ec->nr_registers = 0;
>
> switch (board) {
> + case BOARD_PW_X570_A:
> case BOARD_RS_B550_E_G:
> case BOARD_RS_X570_E_G:
> case BOARD_R_C8H:
> @@ -153,6 +156,7 @@ static void asus_wmi_ec_fill_board_sensors(struct
> asus_wmi_ec_info *ec, int boar
> }
>
> switch (board) {
> + case BOARD_PW_X570_A:
> case BOARD_RS_X570_E_G:
> case BOARD_R_C8H:
> case BOARD_R_C8DH:
> @@ -166,6 +170,7 @@ static void asus_wmi_ec_fill_board_sensors(struct
> asus_wmi_ec_info *ec, int boar
> }
>
> switch (board) {
> + case BOARD_PW_X570_A:
> case BOARD_RS_X570_E_G:
> case BOARD_R_C8H:
> case BOARD_R_C8F:
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> index ba18c1cbf572..ff28ba70a8b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> @@ -5000,6 +5000,7 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr, struct
> nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
> static struct platform_device *pdev[2];
>
> static const char * const asus_wmi_boards[] = {
> + "Pro WS X570-ACE",
> "PRIME B360-PLUS",
> "PRIME B460-PLUS",
> "PRIME X570-PRO",
> ```
>
> Now, with nct6775 I do not need `acpi_enforce_resources=lax` any more, and it
> works straight away:
>
> ```
> nct6798-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> in0: 1.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> in1: 1.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in2: 3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in3: 3.36 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in4: 1.74 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in5: 592.00 mV (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in6: 1.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in7: 3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in8: 3.25 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in9: 888.00 mV (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in10: 8.00 mV (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in11: 80.00 mV (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in12: 1.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in13: 1.35 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in14: 888.00 mV (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> fan1: 743 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
> fan2: 366 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
> fan3: 724 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
> fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
> fan7: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
> SYSTIN: +35.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor =
> thermistor
> CPUTIN: +43.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor =
> thermistor
> AUXTIN0: +22.0°C sensor = thermistor
> AUXTIN1: +127.0°C sensor = thermistor
> AUXTIN2: +109.0°C sensor = thermistor
> AUXTIN3: +32.0°C sensor = thermistor
> PECI Agent 0 Calibration: +44.5°C
> PCH_CHIP_CPU_MAX_TEMP: +0.0°C
> PCH_CHIP_TEMP: +0.0°C
> PCH_CPU_TEMP: +0.0°C
> intrusion0: ALARM
> intrusion1: OK
> beep_enable: disabled
> ```
>
> With asus_wmi_sensors I get this:
>
> ```
> asuswmiecsensors-isa-0000
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> CPU_Opt: 0 RPM
> Chipset: 1733 RPM
> Chipset: +58.0°C
> CPU: +45.0°C
> Motherboard: +35.0°C
> T_Sensor: +216.0°C
> VRM: +34.0°C
> CPU: 7.00 A
> ```
>
> Everything seems to be good except that `T_Sensor`. Probably, I should exclude
> it on this board?
>
> If you are fine with the approach above, I'll post 2 patches for this board.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists