[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVkkG+KOV6GQBAUf@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 03:31:39 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, keescook@...omium.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, qiang.zhang@...driver.com,
robdclark@...omium.org, christian@...uner.io,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kernel: replace sizeof(task->comm) with TASK_COMM_LEN
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:50:32AM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
> unsigned long, arg4, unsigned long, arg5)
> {
> struct task_struct *me = current;
> - unsigned char comm[sizeof(me->comm)];
> + unsigned char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
> long error;
>
> error = security_task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
Slightly below you have this:
case PR_SET_NAME:
comm[sizeof(me->comm) - 1] = 0;
if (strncpy_from_user(comm, (char __user *)arg2,
sizeof(me->comm) - 1) < 0)
return -EFAULT;
set_task_comm(me, comm);
proc_comm_connector(me);
break;
How had that been tested?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists