linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/29] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:48:39 +0000
From:   "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/29] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions

On Oct 2, 2021, at 18:05, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01 2021 at 22:50, Chang Seok Bae wrote:
>> Sending this version as it follows up the discussion [1] with some code
>> changes from v10. This is not intended to ignore your comment on v10 at all.
>> Appreciate your points on my oversights that I will address in v12 soon.
> 
> why on earth did you make Chang send these patches out when there are
> fundamental review comments on the fly vs. the previous version?

My apologies. I regret sending v11 as fundamental rework is going on, that you
shared in the other mail [1].

Also, perhaps it might be a better way to separate the last patch in
particular. Soak out with more eyes on it, then send it as RFC at best IMO.

I would think right now to focus on helping your rework and addressing what
you pointed out on v10 patches. I will revisit the last patch later.

Thanks,
Chang

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/878rz9gdbb.ffs@tglx/