[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564a850a-41e4-31fc-9ebe-51ac6b859f62@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:19:30 +0530
From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
To: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3] Few Tegra210 ADMA fixes
Hi Vinod,
On 9/15/2021 9:37 PM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Following are the fixes in the series:
> - Couple of minor fixes (non functional fixes)
>
> - ADMA FIFO size fix: The slave ADMAIF channels have different default
> FIFO sizes (ADMAIF FIFO is actually a ring buffer and it is divided
> amongst all available channels). As per HW recommendation the sizes
> should match with the corresponding ADMA channels to which ADMAIF
> channel is mapped to at runtime. Thus program ADMA channel FIFO sizes
> accordingly. Otherwise FIFO corruption is observed.
>
> Sameer Pujar (3):
> dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Re-order 'has_outstanding_reqs' member
> dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Add description for 'adma_get_burst_config'
> dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Override ADMA FIFO size
>
> drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
Are these patches good to be picked up? or I need to resend these?
Thanks,
Sameer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists