lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 09:13:14 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     torvic9@...lbox.org, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [5.15] Compilation error in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h with clang-14

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:49 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/10/21 11:30, torvic9@...lbox.org wrote:
> >
> >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> hat am 04.10.2021 11:26 geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/10/21 11:08, torvic9@...lbox.org wrote:
> >>> I encounter the following issue when compiling 5.15-rc4 with clang-14:
> >>>
> >>> In file included from arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:27:
> >>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h:318:9: error: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Werror,-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
> >>>           return __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, spte) |
> >>>                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>                                                    ||
> >>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h:318:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
> >>
> >> The warning is wrong, as mentioned in the line right above:
> >
> > So it's an issue with clang-14 then?
> > (I add Nick and Nathan)
>
> My clang here doesn't have the option, so I'm going to ask---are you
> using W=1?  I can see why clang is warning for KVM's code, but in my
> opinion such a check should only be in -Wextra.

This is a newly added warning in top of tree clang.

>
> Paolo
>
> >>
> >>           /*
> >>            * Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the reserved
> >>            * bits and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid an extra Jcc
> >>            * (this is extremely unlikely to be short-circuited as true).
> >>            */
> >>
> >> Paolo
> >
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ