linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Convert to YAML bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:01:43 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Convert to YAML
 bindings

On Mon 04 Oct 00:22 PDT 2021, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:35:31PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 04-10-21, 10:13, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Convert Qualcomm cpufreq devicetree binding to YAML.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > 
> > I am not sure if Rob ever gave this.
> > 
> 
> I'm not fooling you :)
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20210701105730.322718-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org/#24312445
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > 
> > Why double signed off ?
> > 
> 
> Ah, it came while I applied the patch from Angelo's series. If you want
> I can send a new version removing one or you can do that while applying.
> 

If you wrote the patch, then Angelo handled it, then you handled it
again the double S-o-b captures that nicely.

Looking it from the other angle, if you remove the first S-o-b, then you
forgot to signed it off when you authored the original patch and if you
skip the last S-o-b then you didn't adequately sign off the final
result.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > -- 
> > viresh