[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211004175629.292270-2-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:56:29 -0700
From: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/1] proc: Allow pid_revalidate() during LOOKUP_RCU
The pid_revalidate() function drops from RCU into REF lookup mode. When
many threads are resolving paths within /proc in parallel, this can
result in heavy spinlock contention on d_lockref as each thread tries to
grab a reference to the /proc dentry (and drop it shortly thereafter).
Investigation indicates that it is not necessary to drop RCU in
pid_revalidate(), as no RCU data is modified and the function never
sleeps. So, remove the LOOKUP_RCU check.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 533d5836eb9a..3042ab418c31 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1979,19 +1979,21 @@ static int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
{
struct inode *inode;
struct task_struct *task;
+ int ret = 0;
- if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
- return -ECHILD;
-
- inode = d_inode(dentry);
- task = get_proc_task(inode);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
+ if (!inode)
+ goto out;
+ task = pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
if (task) {
pid_update_inode(task, inode);
- put_task_struct(task);
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
}
- return 0;
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
static inline bool proc_inode_is_dead(struct inode *inode)
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists