[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211004180311.GD2515663@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:03:11 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
Neta Ostrovsky <netao@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 08/13] RDMA/nldev: Allow optional-counter
status configuration through RDMA netlink
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:02:24AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> - if (nla_get_u32(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_RES]) != RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_QP)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + target = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(stats->num_counters),
> + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!target)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Same comment about the type here
This almost wants to be two patches to split up the set_doit then add
the new setter, it is hard to read..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists