[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVtEUpIFdOrIoH0B@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 13:13:38 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
shan.gavin@...il.com, will@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
maz@...nel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA
node
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:41:18 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The empty memory nodes, where no memory resides in, are allowed.
> The NUMA node IDs are still valid and parsed, but memory may be
> added to them through hotplug afterwards. Currently, QEMU fails
> to boot when multiple empty memory nodes are specified. It's
> caused by device-tree population failure and duplicated memory
> node names.
>
> The device-tree specification doesn't provide how empty NUMA
> nodes are handled. Besides, I finds difficulty to get where
> this case is documented. So lets add a section for empty memory
> nodes to cover it in NUMA binding document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists