linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: add dt binding header for ralink RT2880 resets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMhs-H_qBkQhzwvcVyFbegf412ecvweOBOYq8NW2hBNYUUCE-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 20:26:11 +0200
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: add dt binding header for ralink
 RT2880 resets

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:02 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > Adds dt binding header for 'ralink,rt2880-reset' resets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/reset/ralink-rt2880.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/ralink-rt2880.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/ralink-rt2880.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/ralink-rt2880.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..266ef521a584
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/ralink-rt2880.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>
> Dual license please.

Ah, ok. I thought the dual license was only for binding yaml files but
not for headers since there are a lot of already mainlined files with
only GPL-2.0. I will take into account from now that binding headers
also need dual license.

Thanks for the review and clarification.

Best regards,
    Sergio Paracuellos