linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load balance between clusters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:54:50 -0700
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        "Cc: Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, msys.mizuma@...il.com,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load
 balance between clusters

On Sat, 2021-10-02 at 20:09 +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks, Tim, for your comments.
> I am ok to make it default "Y" for x86 after having a better doc as
> below:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index bd27b1cdac34..940eb1fe0abb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1002,12 +1002,17 @@ config NR_CPUS
>           to the kernel image.
> 
>  config SCHED_CLUSTER
> -       bool "Cluster scheduler support"
> -       default n
> +       def_bool y
> +       prompt "Cluster scheduler support"
>         help
>          Cluster scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's
> decision
> -        making when dealing with machines that have clusters of CPUs
> -        sharing L2 cache. If unsure say N here.
> +        making when dealing with machines that have clusters of
> CPUs.
> +        Cluster usually means a couple of CPUs which are placed
> closely
> +        by sharing mid-level caches, last-level cache tags or
> internal
> +        busses. For example, on x86 Jacobsville, each 4 CPUs share
> one
> +        L2 cache. This feature isn't a universal win because it can
> bring
> +        a cost of slightly increased overhead in some places. If
> unsure
> +        say N here.
> 
> This also aligns well with SCHED_MC and SCHED_SMT in
> arch/x86/kconfig:
> config SCHED_MC
>     def_bool y
>     prompt "Multi-core scheduler support"
> 
> config SCHED_SMT
>     def_bool y if SMP
> 
> But ARM64 is running in a different tradition, arch/arm64/Kconfig has
> SCHED_MC and SCHED_SMT as below:
>    config SCHED_MC
>    bool "Multi-core scheduler support"
>    help
>     ...
> 
> config SCHED_SMT
>   bool "SMT scheduler support"
>   help
>   ...
> 
> 

Barry,

Found one minor fix to the x86 patch to take care of compile error for
!CONFIG_SMP.

Thanks.

Tim

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
index 2548d824f103..cc164777e661 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -109,12 +109,12 @@ extern const struct cpumask *cpu_clustergroup_mask(int cpu);
 #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu)	(cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
 #define topology_logical_die_id(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).logical_die_id)
 #define topology_die_id(cpu)			(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_die_id)
-#define topology_cluster_id(cpu)		(per_cpu(cpu_l2c_id, cpu))
 #define topology_core_id(cpu)			(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
 
 extern unsigned int __max_die_per_package;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#define topology_cluster_id(cpu)		(per_cpu(cpu_l2c_id, cpu))
 #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)		(per_cpu(cpu_die_map, cpu))
 #define topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu)		(cpu_clustergroup_mask(cpu))
 #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu)		(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu))