[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1723492337.161319.1633342255263@office.mailbox.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 12:10:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: torvic9@...lbox.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [5.15] Compilation error in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h with
clang-14
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> hat am 04.10.2021 11:49 geschrieben:
>
>
> On 04/10/21 11:30, torvic9@...lbox.org wrote:
> >
> >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> hat am 04.10.2021 11:26 geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/10/21 11:08, torvic9@...lbox.org wrote:
> >>> I encounter the following issue when compiling 5.15-rc4 with clang-14:
> >>>
> >>> In file included from arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:27:
> >>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h:318:9: error: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Werror,-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
> >>> return __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, spte) |
> >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> ||
> >>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h:318:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
> >>
> >> The warning is wrong, as mentioned in the line right above:
> >
> > So it's an issue with clang-14 then?
> > (I add Nick and Nathan)
>
> My clang here doesn't have the option, so I'm going to ask---are you
> using W=1? I can see why clang is warning for KVM's code, but in my
> opinion such a check should only be in -Wextra.
I don't use any options (not that I'm aware of).
Clang version 14.0.0 5f7a5353301b776ffb0e5fb048992898507bf7ee
>
> Paolo
>
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the reserved
> >> * bits and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid an extra Jcc
> >> * (this is extremely unlikely to be short-circuited as true).
> >> */
> >>
> >> Paolo
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists