[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <270324.1633342386@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:13:06 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
Hi Linus,
Do you want patches that quash warnings from W=1 (mostly kerneldoc warnings in
comments in this case[1]) at this point in the cycle, or would you rather they
waited till the next merge window?
David
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/163281899704.2790286.9177774252843775348.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists