[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccee8f63-f5dd-6231-5625-a67ad3b80a6d@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 19:36:54 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Nghia Le <nghialm78@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb.c: remove dead store in demote_size_show()
On 10/3/21 6:54 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 06:41:13PM +0700, Nghia Le wrote:
>> {
>> struct hstate *h;
>> - unsigned long demote_size;
>> int nid;
>>
>> h = kobj_to_hstate(kobj, &nid);
>> - demote_size = h->demote_order;
>>
>> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%lukB\n",
>> (unsigned long)(PAGE_SIZE << h->demote_order) / SZ_1K);
>
> I'd suggest this function would look better written as:
>
> int nid;
> struct hstate *h = kobj_to_hstate(kobj, &nid);
> unsigned long demote_size = (PAGE_SIZE << h->demote_order) / SZ_1K;
>
> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%lukB\n", demote_size);
>
Thank you Nghia Le for spotting this, and thank you Matthew for the
suggestion.
This is still just in Andrew's tree and subject to modification before
the next merge window. I am still expecting additional comments on the
series.
If another version of the series is needed, I will include Matthew's
suggestion. If not, I will ask Andrew how he would prefer to fold in
the changes.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists