[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211004125029.079829669@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:51:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 04/57] cifs: fix incorrect check for null pointer in header_assemble
From: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
commit 9ed38fd4a15417cac83967360cf20b853bfab9b6 upstream.
Although very unlikely that the tlink pointer would be null in this case,
get_next_mid function can in theory return null (but not an error)
so need to check for null (not for IS_ERR, which can not be returned
here).
Address warning:
fs/smbfs_client/connect.c:2392 cifs_match_super()
warn: 'tlink' isn't an ERR_PTR
Pointed out by Dan Carpenter via smatch code analysis tool
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cifs/connect.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
@@ -2960,9 +2960,10 @@ cifs_match_super(struct super_block *sb,
spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
tlink = cifs_get_tlink(cifs_sb_master_tlink(cifs_sb));
- if (IS_ERR(tlink)) {
+ if (tlink == NULL) {
+ /* can not match superblock if tlink were ever null */
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
- return rc;
+ return 0;
}
tcon = tlink_tcon(tlink);
ses = tcon->ses;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists