lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211004055542.kw7npqif5jfcdugt@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:25:42 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress: Drop unused variable

On 09-09-21, 11:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> arm:allmodconfig fails to build with the following error.
> 
> drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c:454:13: error:
> 					unused variable 'cur_cluster'
> 
> Remove the unused variable.
> 
> Fixes: bb8c26d9387f ("cpufreq: vexpress: Set CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag")
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> index 284b6bd040b1..d295f405c4bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,6 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  static int ve_spc_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  	struct device *cpu_dev;
> -	int cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
>  
>  	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
>  	if (!cpu_dev) {

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ