linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST,UPDATED PATCH] kernfs: don't create a negative dentry if inactive node exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YVqbXADscqYEBaFZ@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:12:44 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REPOST,UPDATED PATCH] kernfs: don't create a negative dentry if
 inactive node exists

On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 08:03:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 01:07:46AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:03:53AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > It's been reported that doing stress test for module insertion and
> > > removal can result in an ENOENT from libkmod for a valid module.
> > > 
> > > In kernfs_iop_lookup() a negative dentry is created if there's no kernfs
> > > node associated with the dentry or the node is inactive.
> > > 
> > > But inactive kernfs nodes are meant to be invisible to the VFS and
> > > creating a negative dentry for these can have unexpected side effects
> > > when the node transitions to an active state.
> > > 
> > > The point of creating negative dentries is to avoid the expensive
> > > alloc/free cycle that occurs if there are frequent lookups for kernfs
> > > attributes that don't exist. So kernfs nodes that are not yet active
> > > should not result in a negative dentry being created so when they
> > > transition to an active state VFS lookups can create an associated
> > > dentry is a natural way.
> > > 
> > > It's also been reported that https://github.com/osandov/blktests.git
> > > test block/001 hangs during the test. It was suggested that recent
> > > changes to blktests might have caused it but applying this patch
> > > resolved the problem without change to blktests.
> > 
> > Looks sane, but which tree should it go through?  I can pick it, but I've
> > no idea if anybody already has kernfs work in their trees...
> 
> I can take it, kernfs patches normally go through my tree, can I get an
> acked-by?

ACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>