linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 91/93] KVM: x86: Handle SRCU initialization failure during page track init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211004125037.599892813@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  4 Oct 2021 14:53:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, TCS Robot <tcs_robot@...cent.com>,
        Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 91/93] KVM: x86: Handle SRCU initialization failure during page track init

From: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>

commit eb7511bf9182292ef1df1082d23039e856d1ddfb upstream.

Check the return of init_srcu_struct(), which can fail due to OOM, when
initializing the page track mechanism.  Lack of checking leads to a NULL
pointer deref found by a modified syzkaller.

Reported-by: TCS Robot <tcs_robot@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
Message-Id: <1630636626-12262-1-git-send-email-tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
[Move the call towards the beginning of kvm_arch_init_vm. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         |    4 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |    7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 			    struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 };
 
-void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
+int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
 }
 
-void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
+int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
 
 	head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
-	init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
 	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list);
+	return init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
 }
 
 /*
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10392,9 +10392,15 @@ void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	if (type)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	ret = kvm_page_track_init(kvm);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.mask_notifier_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages);
@@ -10421,7 +10427,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, un
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, kvmclock_sync_fn);
 
 	kvm_hv_init_vm(kvm);
-	kvm_page_track_init(kvm);
 	kvm_mmu_init_vm(kvm);
 
 	return kvm_x86_ops.vm_init(kvm);