linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 155/172] ext4: fix reserved space counter leakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211004125049.975194364@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  4 Oct 2021 14:53:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
        Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 155/172] ext4: fix reserved space counter leakage

From: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>

commit 6fed83957f21eff11c8496e9f24253b03d2bc1dc upstream.

When ext4_insert_delayed block receives and recovers from an error from
ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(), e.g., ENOMEM, it does not release the
space it has reserved for that block insertion as it should. One effect
of this bug is that s_dirtyclusters_counter is not decremented and
remains incorrectly elevated until the file system has been unmounted.
This can result in premature ENOSPC returns and apparent loss of free
space.

Another effect of this bug is that
/sys/fs/ext4/<dev>/delayed_allocation_blocks can remain non-zero even
after syncfs has been executed on the filesystem.

Besides, add check for s_dirtyclusters_counter when inode is going to be
evicted and freed. s_dirtyclusters_counter can still keep non-zero until
inode is written back in .evict_inode(), and thus the check is delayed
to .destroy_inode().

Fixes: 51865fda28e5 ("ext4: let ext4 maintain extent status tree")
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210823061358.84473-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    5 +++++
 fs/ext4/super.c |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1640,6 +1640,7 @@ static int ext4_insert_delayed_block(str
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
 	int ret;
 	bool allocated = false;
+	bool reserved = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the cluster containing lblk is shared with a delayed,
@@ -1656,6 +1657,7 @@ static int ext4_insert_delayed_block(str
 		ret = ext4_da_reserve_space(inode);
 		if (ret != 0)   /* ENOSPC */
 			goto errout;
+		reserved = true;
 	} else {   /* bigalloc */
 		if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode, &ext4_es_is_delonly, lblk)) {
 			if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode,
@@ -1668,6 +1670,7 @@ static int ext4_insert_delayed_block(str
 					ret = ext4_da_reserve_space(inode);
 					if (ret != 0)   /* ENOSPC */
 						goto errout;
+					reserved = true;
 				} else {
 					allocated = true;
 				}
@@ -1678,6 +1681,8 @@ static int ext4_insert_delayed_block(str
 	}
 
 	ret = ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(inode, lblk, allocated);
+	if (ret && reserved)
+		ext4_da_release_space(inode, 1);
 
 errout:
 	return ret;
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1351,6 +1351,12 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct in
 				true);
 		dump_stack();
 	}
+
+	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks)
+		ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR,
+			 "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!",
+			 inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
+			 EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
 }
 
 static void init_once(void *foo)