linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 PCIe PHY require no supply

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:47:02 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: IPQ6018 and IPQ8074
 PCIe PHY require no supply

On Mon 04 Oct 23:34 PDT 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:

> On 29-09-21, 11:42, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The qmp-phy driver suggests that 'vdda-phy-supply' and 'vdda-pll-supply'
> > are not required for IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY.  Update the
> > bindings to reflect it.
> > 
> > While at it, also correct the clock properies for IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY.
> > And as the result, 'qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy' and
> > 'qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy' share the same clock, reset and supply
> > bindings.
> 
> Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> 

I think it's better if you take the two dt-bindings through your tree,
so we avoid any potential merge conflicts related to possible other
changes.

Regards,
Bjorn