linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memory: RENESAS_RPCIF should select RESET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:56:46 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: RENESAS_RPCIF should select RESET_CONTROLLER

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 05:23:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The Renesas RPC-IF driver calls devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(),
> which returns -ENOTSUPP if CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is not enabled.
> Even if this error is ignored, later calls to reset_control_reset() will
> fail with a scary WARN_ON() backtrace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Yes, it is required. With the latter paragraph in the commit message
removed:

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)