[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f5ea6a-5d04-57cc-f4e4-bf29f22af7f0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:16:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 13/35] drm/tegra: gr2d: Support generic power domain
and runtime PM
...
>> It's not a problem to change this patchset. The problem is that if
>> you'll grep mainline for 'pm_runtime_disable', you will find that there
>> are a lot of drivers in a potential trouble.
>
> Let's start by fixing this patchset, please - then we can consider
> what to do with the other cases separately.
Yeah, should be better to discuss it separately.
...
>> void __pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev, bool check_resume)
>> {
>> + flush_work(&dev->power.work);
>> +
>
> What about the latency this may introduce? I am not sure that is
> acceptable here!?
I'm not aware about any code which relies on the original 'cancelling'
behaviour, perhaps Rafael should have more insight.
...
>> The sysfs rpm-forbid is a separate problem and it's less troublesome
>> since it requires root privileges. It's also not something that
>> userspace touches casually. For now I don't know what could be done
>> about it.
>
> As I said, the common method to address this problem is to run the
> following sequence:
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync()
> "power off the device"
> pm_runtime_disable()
> pm_runtime_put_noidle()
>
> This works even if user space, via sysfs, has triggered a call to
> pm_runtime_forbid(). Or doesn't it?
>
> If you don't like it, pm_runtime_force_suspend() should work too, at
> least for your cases, I believe.
I'll update the patches, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists