[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef5b1654-1f75-da82-cab8-248319efbe3f@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:01:59 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rcu: Use typeof(p) instead of typeof(*p) *
On 05/10/2021 15.47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That is, instead of declaring: typeof(*p) *_p; just do:
> typeof(p) _p;
>
> Also had to update a lot of the function pointer initialization in the
> networking code, as a function address must be passed as an argument in
> RCU_INIT_POINTER()
I would think that one could avoid that churn by saying
typeof((p) + 0)
instead of just "typeof(p)", to force the decay to a pointer.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists