[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52wN1s=Ph4r4iLposxNPfa562Bv1mM81j1KvNmWOQS1-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 11:45:50 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sankeerth Billakanti <sbillaka@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dp: Shorten SETUP timeout
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-10-04 19:37:50)
> Found in the middle of a patch from Sankeerth was the reduction of the
> INIT_SETUP timeout from 10s to 100ms. Upon INIT_SETUP timeout the host
> is initalized and HPD interrupt start to be serviced, so in the case of
> eDP this reduction improves the user experience dramatically - i.e.
> removes 9.9s of bland screen time at boot.
>
> Suggested-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <sbillaka@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
Any Fixes tag? BTW, the delay design is pretty convoluted. I had to go
re-read the code a couple times to understand that it's waiting 100ms
times the 'delay' number. Whaaaaat?
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists