linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/2] leds: mt6360: Add LED driver for MT6360

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 21:33:02 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Gene Chen <gene.chen.richtek@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>, Wilma.Wu@...iatek.com,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        benjamin.chao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/2] leds: mt6360: Add LED driver for MT6360

Pavel,

On 10/5/21 11:21 AM, Gene Chen wrote:
> Gene Chen <gene.chen.richtek@...il.com> 於 2021年7月16日 週五 下午4:33寫道：
>>
>>
>> This patch series add MT6360 LED support contains driver and binding document
>>
>> Gene Chen (2)
>>   dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for MT6360 LED
>>   leds: mt6360: Add LED driver for MT6360
>>
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6360.yaml |  159 ++
>>   drivers/leds/flash/Kconfig                              |   13
>>   drivers/leds/flash/Makefile                             |    1
>>   drivers/leds/flash/leds-mt6360.c                        |  910 ++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 1083 insertions(+)

Do you see Gene's emails or maybe they land somehow in your spam folder?
It's been four months since last version addressing your remarks.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski