lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  5 Oct 2021 13:46:32 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: fix kernel-doc warnings due to mismatched arg names

Commit 7122debb4367 ("kunit: introduce
kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers") added new functions but
called last arg `flags`, unlike the existing code that used `gfp`.
This only is an issue in test.h, test.c still used `gfp`.

But the documentation was copy-pasted with the old names, leading to
kernel-doc warnings.

Do s/flags/gfp to make the names consistent and fix the warnings.

Fixes: 7122debb4367 ("kunit: introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
 include/kunit/test.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 24b40e5c160b..018e776a34b9 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res);
  * and is automatically cleaned up after the test case concludes. See &struct
  * kunit_resource for more information.
  */
-void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags);
+void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
 
 /**
  * kunit_kmalloc() - Like kmalloc() except the allocation is *test managed*.
@@ -657,9 +657,9 @@ static inline void *kunit_kzalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
  *
  * See kcalloc() and kunit_kmalloc_array() for more information.
  */
-static inline void *kunit_kcalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+static inline void *kunit_kcalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	return kunit_kmalloc_array(test, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return kunit_kmalloc_array(test, n, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
 }
 
 void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);

base-commit: 3b29021ddd10cfb6b2565c623595bd3b02036f33
-- 
2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists