linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: Fix allocation sizeof argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54360564-57e4-60de-60be-13177448ebc5@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 22:52:48 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: Fix allocation sizeof argument

On 05/10/21 19:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>   I wasn't suggesting a full revert,
> rather a "drop and pretend it never got applied", with a plan to apply a new
> version instead of fixing up the current code.

Considering that there are issues in the rmaps as well, I'd rather fix 
both the right way.

Paolo