linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.15-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211005022849.GA1391135@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:28:49 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.15-rc4

On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 02:26:40PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This release continues to look pretty normal after the initial
> hiccups. At least going purely by number of commits, we're right smack
> dab in the middle of the normal range for this time in the release
> cycle, and the diffstat looks fairly normal too. A bit less
> driver-heavy than usual, perhaps, but nothing big, and nothing that
> makes me go "that's strange".
> 
> One thing standing out in the diffs might be the m68k 'set_fs()'
> removal - not really a regression fix, but it has been pending for a
> while, and it turned out that the problems attributed to it were due
> to an entirely unrelated m68k signal handling issue. So with that
> fixed, we could get rid of set_fs from another architecture. There's a
> few more architectures I'd like to see it removed from, but all the
> actively maintained ones have already removed it, so on the whole
> set_fs really is a thing of the past, only used by legacy
> architectures.
> 
> Anyway, about a third of the diff is drivers (net, sound, rdma, gpu),
> with the rest being a mix of arch updates (the m68k set_fs stuff and
> some kvm patches), tooling (mostly selftest updates), filesystem code
> and core networking.
> 
> The appended shortlog gives you more details, but if you really want
> to dig into it, go for the git tree.
> 
> Go test,

Looking pretty good here.

Build results:
	total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 480 pass: 480 fail: 0

Guenter