[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n50=EWg1GKuTnRi=zA0ufO1Xg4mucYaqNUZ+wgYNDRcWLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 20:58:03 -0400
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/msm/dp: Support up to 3 DP controllers
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-10-01 11:00:56)
> Based on the removal of the g_dp_display and the movement of the
> priv->dp lookup into the DP code it's now possible to have multiple
> DP instances.
>
> In line with the other controllers in the MSM driver, introduce a
> per-compatible list of base addresses which is used to resolve the
> "instance id" for the given DP controller. This instance id is used as
> index in the priv->dp[] array.
>
> Then extend the initialization code to initialize struct drm_encoder for
> each of the registered priv->dp[] and update the logic for associating
> each struct msm_dp with the struct dpu_encoder_virt.
>
> Lastly, bump the number of struct msm_dp instances carries by priv->dp
> to 3, the currently known maximum number of controllers found in a
> Qualcomm SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Some nits below.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Added MSM_DRM_DP_COUNT to link the two 3s
> - Moved NULL check for msm_dp_debugfs_init() to the call site
> - Made struct dp_display_private->id unsigned
>
> I also implemented added connector_type to each of the DP instances and
> propagated this to dp_drm_connector_init() but later dropped this again per
> Doug's suggestion that we'll base this on the presence/absence of a associated
> drm bridge or panel.
Sad but OK. We can take up that topic in another patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> index f655adbc2421..875b07e7183d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> @@ -203,8 +204,10 @@ static int dpu_kms_debugfs_init(struct msm_kms *kms, struct drm_minor *minor)
> dpu_debugfs_vbif_init(dpu_kms, entry);
> dpu_debugfs_core_irq_init(dpu_kms, entry);
>
> - if (priv->dp)
> - msm_dp_debugfs_init(priv->dp, minor);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dp); i++) {
> + if (priv->dp[i])
> + msm_dp_debugfs_init(priv->dp[i], minor);
This seems to cause a bunch of debugfs warnings when there are multiple
nodes created with the same name.
> + }
>
> return dpu_core_perf_debugfs_init(dpu_kms, entry);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 5d3ee5ef07c2..ff3477474c5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -1180,10 +1192,31 @@ int dp_display_request_irq(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int dp_display_find_id(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + const struct msm_dp_config *cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + struct resource *res;
> + int i;
> +
> +
Nitpick: Remove a newline here.
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_descs; i++) {
> + if (cfg->io_start[i] == res->start)
> + return i;
> + }
Nitpick: Drop braces on single line if inside for loop.
> +
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown displayport instance\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists