lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Michael Grzeschik <mgr@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: dwc3: gadget: Revert "set gadgets parent to
 the right controller"

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:52 AM Michael Grzeschik <mgr@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:35:57PM +0200, Ferry Toth wrote:
> >Op 04-10-2021 om 16:18 schreef Andy Shevchenko:
> >>The commit c6e23b89a95d ("usb: dwc3: gadget: set gadgets parent to the right
> >>controller") changed the device for the UDC and broke the user space scripts
> >>that instantiate the USB gadget(s) via ConfigFS.
> >
> >I confirm this regression on Intel Edison since at least 5.15-rc2
> >while in 5.14.0 it was working fine.
> >
> >This patch resolves the issue as tested on 5.15-rc4.
> >
> >Tested-by: Ferry Toth<fntoth@...il.com>
>
> NACK! Why should we resolv an issue by reverting it to solve not working
> userspace.

Huh?!

It is
 a) used to work;
 b) stopped working after your commit.

To me it's a clear regression. Whatever deeper problem is there, I
really don't care. The change broke my _user space_ case!

> We already have this patch as a solution for solving a deeper
> Problem, regarding the allocator addressing the right device.

Then rework it. You have still time. Your case wasn't working and one
more release of not working is not an issue here.

> >>Revert it for now until the better solution will be proposed.
>
> So, I think fixing the userspace would be the right fix,

Huh?!
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/4.Coding.html#regressions

> not changing
> the kernel. Otherwise we should find a proper solution.

So, please do. v5.15 should still work on our devices with
distribution that uses ConfigFS, no?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ