[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e734691b-e9e1-10a0-88ee-73d8fceb50f9@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 11:38:29 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
nilal@...hat.com, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: isolation: retain initial mask for kthread VM
worker
[+Wanpeng]
On 05/10/21 00:26, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
>
> kvm_vm_worker_thread() creates a kthread VM worker and migrates it
> to the parent cgroup using cgroup_attach_task_all() based on its
> effective cpumask.
>
> In an environment that is booted with the nohz_full kernel option, cgroup's
> effective cpumask can also include CPUs running in nohz_full mode. These
> CPUs often run SCHED_FIFO tasks which may result in the starvation of the
> VM worker if it has been migrated to one of these CPUs.
There are other effects of cgroups (e.g. memory accounting) than just
the cpumask; for v1 you could just skip the cpuset, but if
cgroup_attach_task_all is ever ported to v2's cgroup_attach_task, we
will not be able to separate the cpuset cgroup from the others.
Why doesn't the scheduler move the task to a CPU that is not being
hogged by vCPU SCHED_FIFO tasks? The parent cgroup should always have
one for userspace's own housekeeping.
As an aside, if we decide that KVM's worker threads count as
housekeeping, you'd still want to bind the kthread to the housekeeping
CPUs(*).
Paolo
(*) switching from kthread_run to kthread_create+kthread_bind_mask
> Since unbounded kernel threads allowed CPU mask already respects nohz_full
> CPUs at the time of their setup (because of 9cc5b8656892: "isolcpus: Affine
> unbound kernel threads to housekeeping cpus"), retain the initial CPU mask
> for the kthread by stopping its migration to the parent cgroup's effective
> CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 7851f3a1b5f7..87bc193fd020 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/ioctl.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>
> #include "coalesced_mmio.h"
> #include "async_pf.h"
> @@ -5634,11 +5635,20 @@ static int kvm_vm_worker_thread(void *context)
> if (err)
> goto init_complete;
>
> - err = cgroup_attach_task_all(init_context->parent, current);
> - if (err) {
> - kvm_err("%s: cgroup_attach_task_all failed with err %d\n",
> - __func__, err);
> - goto init_complete;
> + /*
> + * For nohz_full enabled environments, don't migrate the worker thread
> + * to parent cgroup as its effective mask may have a CPU running in
> + * nohz_full mode. nohz_full CPUs often run SCHED_FIFO task which could
> + * result in starvation of the worker thread if it is pinned on the same
> + * CPU.
> + */
> + if (!housekeeping_enabled(HK_FLAG_KTHREAD)) {
> + err = cgroup_attach_task_all(init_context->parent, current);
> + if (err) {
> + kvm_err("%s: cgroup_attach_task_all failed with err %d\n",
> + __func__, err);
> + goto init_complete;
> + }
> }
>
> set_user_nice(current, task_nice(init_context->parent));
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists