linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] PCI: Add support for Apple M1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o883rdz1.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:57:22 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org list" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        opensuse-ppc@...nsuse.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] PCI: Add support for Apple M1

On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:42:45 +0100,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:52 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, I pushed patches 1-3 to kernelCI and didn't see any regressions.
> > I am a bit worried about changes to the DT interrupt parsing and
> > ancient platforms (such as PowerMacs). Most likely there wouldn't be
> > any report until -rc1 or months later on those old systems.
> 
> Lets page the PPC lists to see if someone can test on some powermac.

/me eyes the XServe-G5 that hasn't been powered on in 10 years. What
could possibly go wrong?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.