linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:03:42 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 10:14 PM Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> >
> > which should be included in linux-next.
> >
> > Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI:
> > Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series:
> >
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/
> >
> > and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that
> > series.  The rest of that series is present in the git branch above.
> >
> > All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that
> > there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them.
> >
> > Ferry, please test!
>
> This is how I tested:
> 3 patches from
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/
> on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before
> 4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git
> then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the
> new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged).
>
> In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch).
>
> Thanks for doing this!

Thank you!