[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVxLHHyxbJOS+66L@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:54:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: marvell: fix compatible in
example
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:03:31AM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > While the MV88E6390 switch chip exists, one is supposed to use a
> > compatible of "marvell,mv88e6190" for it. Fix this in the given example.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>
>
> Fixes: a3c53be55c95 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO busses")
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> Hi Marcel
>
> Since this is a fix, it should be sent separately, and for net, not
> net-next.
Ah, i need to expand that comment a bit. This patch is effectively to
the networking subsystem, where as the reset are for
mvebu/arm-soc. They have different Maintainers. Please see:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists