linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load balance between clusters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:50:45 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        "Cc\: Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, msys.mizuma@...il.com,
        "Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load balance between clusters

On 05/10/21 14:42, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 05/10/21 09:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 04:22:46PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 16:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> > The one questino I have is, do we want default y?
>>>
>>> I also agree that default y is preferable.
>>
>> I'll change at least the x86 one to:
>>
>>       default y
>>       depends on SMP
>>
>
> Huh, so the arm64 SCHED_{SMT,MC} configs are defaultless (I added SCHED_SMT
> to arm64's defconfig not so long ago), but x86 has them default y, which
> I'm thinking is a tad better, and would be nice to harmonize. Unfortunately
> different architectures have their own dependency requirements - arm has
> ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY, parisc has PARISC_CPU_TOPOLOGY...
>
> Would you hate making SCHED_* a "generic" config, with a common default and
> help text, and punt the arch specific stuff to an ARCH_SUPPORTS_* knob?
>
> Something like:
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig:
>   select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>
> init/Kconfig:
>   config SCHED_MC
>     def_bool y
>     depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC && SMP

... Which is essentially what Barry suggested somewhere else in the thread
(I TL; DR'd).