linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 36/40] perf/x86: Reset destroy callback on event init failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211005135020.214291-36-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Oct 2021 09:50:15 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        acme@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 36/40] perf/x86: Reset destroy callback on event init failure

From: Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 02d029a41dc986e2d5a77ecca45803857b346829 ]

perf_init_event tries multiple init callbacks and does not reset the
event state between tries. When x86_pmu_event_init runs, it
unconditionally sets the destroy callback to hw_perf_event_destroy. On
the next init attempt after x86_pmu_event_init, in perf_try_init_event,
if the pmu's capabilities includes PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE, the destroy
callback will be run. However, if the next init didn't set the destroy
callback, hw_perf_event_destroy will be run (since the callback wasn't
reset).

Looking at other pmu init functions, the common pattern is to only set
the destroy callback on a successful init. Resetting the callback on
failure tries to replicate that pattern.

This was discovered after commit f11dd0d80555 ("perf/x86/amd/ibs: Extend
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE to IBS Op") when the second (and only second)
run of the perf tool after a reboot results in 0 samples being
generated. The extra run of hw_perf_event_destroy results in
active_events having an extra decrement on each perf run. The second run
has active_events == 0 and every subsequent run has active_events < 0.
When active_events == 0, the NMI handler will early-out and not record
any samples.

Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210929170405.1.I078b98ee7727f9ae9d6df8262bad7e325e40faf0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 3092fbf9dbe4..98729ce89917 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2467,6 +2467,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (err) {
 		if (event->destroy)
 			event->destroy(event);
+		event->destroy = NULL;
 	}

 	if (READ_ONCE(x86_pmu.attr_rdpmc) &&
-- 
2.33.0