lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:43:11 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: strace build error static assertion failed: "XFRM_MSG_MAPPING !=
 0x26"

Hi,

When compiling strace-5.14 (although it looks like the same problem 
would exist with bleeding edge strace) with headers from the tip of 
Linus's tree (5.15.0-rc4) I get the following error

strace: In file included from static_assert.h:11,
strace:                  from print_fields.h:12,
strace:                  from defs.h:1901,
strace:                  from netlink.c:10:
strace: xlat/nl_xfrm_types.h:162:1: error: static assertion failed: 
"XFRM_MSG_MAPPING != 0x26"
strace:  static_assert((XFRM_MSG_MAPPING) == (0x26), "XFRM_MSG_MAPPING 
!= 0x26");
strace:  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

It looks like commit 2d151d39073a ("xfrm: Add possibility to set the 
default to block if we have no policy") added some XFRM messages and the 
numbers shifted. Is this considered an ABI breakage?

I'm not sure if this is a strace problem or a linux problem so I'm 
reporting it in both places.

Thanks,
Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ