[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVzvbUr2zO/Nw0Xf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:35:57 -0700
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@....com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] memblock: improve MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG documentation
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 11:36:02AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> The description of MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG is currently short and consequently
> misleading: we're actually dealing with a memory region that might get
> hotunplugged later (i.e., the platform+firmware supports it), yet it is
> indicated in the firmware-provided memory map as system ram that will just
> get used by the system for any purpose when not taking special care. The
> firmware marked this memory region as a hot(un)plugged (e.g., hotplugged
> before reboot), implying that it might get hotunplugged again later.
>
> Whether we consider this information depends on the "movable_node" kernel
> commandline parameter: only with "movable_node" set, we'll try keeping
> this memory hotunpluggable, for example, by not serving early allocations
> from this memory region and by letting the buddy manage it using the
> ZONE_MOVABLE.
>
> Let's make this clearer by extending the documentation.
>
> Note: kexec *has to* indicate this memory to the second kernel. With
> "movable_node" set, we don't want to place kexec-images on this memory.
> Without "movable_node" set, we don't care and can place kexec-images on
> this memory. In both cases, after successful memory hotunplug, kexec has to
> be re-armed to update the memory map for the second kernel and to place the
> kexec-images somewhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 34de69b3b8ba..4ee8dd2d63a7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,11 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn;
> /**
> * enum memblock_flags - definition of memory region attributes
> * @MEMBLOCK_NONE: no special request
> - * @MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG: hotpluggable region
> + * @MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG: memory region indicated in the firmware-provided memory
> + * map during early boot as hot(un)pluggable system RAM (e.g., memory range
> + * that might get hotunplugged later). With "movable_node" set on the kernel
> + * commandline, try keeping this memory region hotunpluggable. Does not apply
> + * to memblocks added ("hotplugged") after early boot.
> * @MEMBLOCK_MIRROR: mirrored region
> * @MEMBLOCK_NOMAP: don't add to kernel direct mapping and treat as
> * reserved in the memory map; refer to memblock_mark_nomap() description
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists