[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e36619df-652d-3550-cb4d-9b65b2f5faee@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:17:09 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: <decui@...rosoft.com>, <kys@...rosoft.com>,
<sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Cap scsi_driver.can_queue to fix a hang
issue during boot
On 06/10/2021 08:03, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> After commit ea2f0f77538c, a 416-CPU VM running on Hyper-V hangs during
> boot because scsi_add_host_with_dma() sets shost->cmd_per_lun to a
> negative number:
> 'max_outstanding_req_per_channel' is 352,
> 'max_sub_channels' is (416 - 1) / 4 = 103, so in storvsc_probe(),
> scsi_driver.can_queue = 352 * (103 + 1) * (100 - 10) / 100 = 32947, which
> is bigger than SHRT_MAX (i.e. 32767).
Out of curiosity, are these values realistic? You're capping can_queue
just because of a data size issue, so, if these values are realistic,
seems a weak reason.
>
> Fix the hang issue by capping scsi_driver.can_queue.
>
> Add the below Fixed tag though ea2f0f77538c itself is good.
>
> Fixes: ea2f0f77538c ("scsi: core: Cap scsi_host cmd_per_lun at can_queue")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index ebbbc1299c62..ba374908aec2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -1976,6 +1976,16 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
> (max_sub_channels + 1) *
> (100 - ring_avail_percent_lowater) / 100;
>
> + /*
> + * v5.14 (see commit ea2f0f77538c) implicitly requires that
> + * scsi_driver.can_queue should not exceed SHRT_MAX, otherwise
> + * scsi_add_host_with_dma() sets shost->cmd_per_lun to a negative
> + * number (note: the type of the "cmd_per_lun" field is "short"), and
> + * the system may hang during early boot.
> + */
The different data sizes for cmd_per_lun and can_queue are problematic here.
I'd be more inclined to set cmd_per_lun to the same data size as
can_queue. We did discuss this when ea2f0f77538c was upstreamed
(actually it was the other way around - setting can_queue to 16b).
Thanks,
John
> + if (scsi_driver.can_queue > SHRT_MAX)
> + scsi_driver.can_queue = SHRT_MAX;
> +
> host = scsi_host_alloc(&scsi_driver,
> sizeof(struct hv_host_device));
> if (!host)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists