linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf vendor events: Categorise the Neoverse V1 counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f657b6e5-3fc2-0ec2-68f8-bc196afface7@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:43:06 +0100
From:   Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@....com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf vendor events: Categorise the Neoverse V1
 counters



On 06/10/2021 09:38, John Garry wrote:
> On 06/10/2021 09:11, Andrew Kilroy wrote:
>> This is so they are categorised in the perf list output.  The pmus all
>> exist in the armv8-common-and-microarch.json and arm-recommended.json
>> files, so this commit places them into each category's own file under
>>
>>    tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-v1
>>
>> Also add the Neoverse V1 to the arm64 mapfile
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kilroy<andrew.kilroy@....com>
>> ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> 
> Note: for the other 2x patches in the series, you should have picked up 
> my reviewed-by tag for v2 (unless they have changed significantly from 
> when the tag was originally granted).
> 
> Thanks,
> John
> 
> 

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that, quite new to this.  :-)

Andrew