[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2110061058470.2311@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:59:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: gor@...ux.ibm.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org,
pmladek@...e.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joe.lawrence@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] sched,livepatch: Use task_call_func()
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Instead of frobbing around with scheduler internals, use the shiny new
> task_call_func() interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
This looks really nice. With the added check for "task != current"
that Petr pointed out
Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists