[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b092f13-832f-5d1d-a504-aea96c81bf17@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:35:20 +0100
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback
Hi Leo,
Many thanks for your comments.
On 04/10/2021 13:27, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi German,
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 01:26:15PM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> So simply say, I think the head pointer monotonically increasing is
> the right thing to do in Arm SPE driver.
I will talk to James about how we can proceed on this.
>> (note that the patch will skip the wrap-around detection if this is the
>> case,
>> in order to handle both cases in the userspace perf tool).
> Almost agree, I read multiple times but have no idea what's the
> "both cases" in the last sentence.
Apologies for the later part was not clear. What I meant to say was that
in the original patch for cs-etm, it seemed to handle both cases where
AUX head might be monotonically and non-monotonically increasing, so we
applied the same for the Arm SPE patch.
>
> Please let me know if anything is not clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c#n1804
Powered by blists - more mailing lists