[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c219168c-2727-0b44-7a05-7c0e31770de4@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:37:58 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>
CC: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
levinale@...gle.com, bleung@...gle.com, rajatxjain@...il.com,
jsbarnes@...gle.com, pmalani@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: hub: Mark devices downstream a removable hub, as
removable
On 05.10.21 21:59, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:51:02AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>> As I understand it, the "removable" property refers specifically to
>>> the device's upstream link, not to whether _any_ of the links leading
>>> from the device to the computer could be removed.
>> No, that is not what it means. I'll cite our sysfs ABI:
>>
>> What: /sys/devices/.../removable
>> Date: May 2021
>> Contact: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>
>> Description:
>> Information about whether a given device can be removed from the
>> platform by the user. This is determined by its subsystem in a
>> bus / platform-specific way. This attribute is only present for
>> devices that can support determining such information:
>>
>> "removable": device can be removed from the platform by the user
>> "fixed": device is fixed to the platform / cannot be removed
>> by the user.
>> "unknown": The information is unavailable / cannot be deduced.
>>
>> Currently this is only supported by USB (which infers the
>> information from a combination of hub descriptor bits and
>> platform-specific data such as ACPI) and PCI (which gets this
>> from ACPI / device tree).
>>
>> It specifically talks about _platform_, not about properties of some
>> peripheral attached to a system. Note that the wording is very similar
>> to what we had for USB devices that originally implemented "removable"
>> attribute:
> In that case, shouldn't Rajat's patch change go into the driver core
> rather than the hub driver? _Every_ device downstream from a
> removable link should count as removable, yes? Not just the USB
> devices.
In theory yes. If your HC is removable by that logic every device is.
That renders the information content of 'removable' to zero. Everything
is removable.
> And to say that the attribute is supported only by USB and PCI is
> misleading, since it applies to every device downstream from a
> removable link.
Exactly and it is a difference. If you know that a device is removable
you must not disable hotplug detection on that port if you want full
functionality. While if you know that a device is not removable you may
straight up cut power, even if the _parent_ is still removable.
The device tree is a tree and if you want to know whether hotplugging
is possible (let's ignore hibernation), you need to walk the tree top to
bottom.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists