lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:46:19 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/92] 5.10.71-rc2 review Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.71 release. > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:32:44 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/230 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/227 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists