linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: Add DSC for SDM845 to hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 16:20:30 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: Add DSC for SDM845 to hw_catalog

On 29-07-21, 23:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 15/07/2021 09:51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > This add SDM845 DSC blocks into hw_catalog
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Changes since RFC:
> >   - use BIT values from MASK
> > 
> >   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> > index b569030a0847..b45a08303c99 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
> >   #define PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER)
> > +#define DSC_SDM845_MASK BIT(1)
> > +
> 
> This does not seem used. You can pass (0) as the feature mask.

Yes fixed

-- 
~Vinod